The Chief of Army Staff, Gen. Tukur Buratai has broken his silence on the December 12 face-off between his men and members of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria, known as Shi’ites.
Members of the sect allegedly blocked the convoy of the Army Chief who was on official assignment on that day and this led to bloody encounter and the death of some of the sect members.
The response of the soldiers has been criticized by human rights activists who saw it as an over-reaction
Buratai who justified the action of his men, said they acted within the law and the rules of engagement.
He spoke at the headquarters of the National Human Rights Commission in Abuja during the opening ceremony of the sitting of an investigative panel set up by the commission on the clash.
“The circumstances that led to the incident of December 12, 2015 have been well articulated by officers that were involved. I was in the convoy. It was my convoy, the convoy of the Chief of Army Staff.
“I left Dutse that morning, hoping to arrive Zaria on time, to attend the passing out parade of the 73 Regular Recruit of Intakes. But, the convoy was blocked when we entered the Zaria City.
“What transpired has been documented by the officers that were with me. They have also made their own statements. And they are here to give full account of what transpired. We are here because we respect human rights.
“We are here because we know the sanctity of the human life which we have sworn to protect. One of our constitutional roles is to defend the territorial integrity of Nigeria, which also include the totality of the protection of human rights and indeed, the property of every Nigeria. We have laid down our lives as army officers and soldiers over the years in the course of performing our constitutional roles.
“There is no way we will pick our weapons and deliberately violate the rights of the people, that we have been paid to defend and protect. This is quite fundamental. We have constitutional responsibility. Drawn from that constitutional responsibility, we also have our rules and regulations. And drawn from that, we have a duty to perform in restoring peace and order where such peace and order are being disturbed. So, we followed our rules of engagement, which are derived from the various laws.”
He argued that those accusing his men of human rights violation were unfair to the Army.
